Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 21 November 2008

Geographic networks

Posted on 08:05 by Unknown
Geography (or spatial arrangement) of nodes is often an important factor in network dynamics. Though it is straightforward to map geographical information by itself, mapping that information simultaneously with network data is quite a challenge.

In collaboration with Holly Massett and her team at the National Cancer Institute, I have been tackling the geographic + network mapping problem head on. Holly and I recently presented some of our results, and she graciously gave me permission to share them.

What happens when we draw a network map with geographically located nodes? We get a map with lines on it:
The geography is plainly apparent, but the network structure is all but invisible. That's a shame, because the network structure hidden above is actually quite striking when you redraw the above network using traditional network layout techniques:
Now we can clearly see that there is one node that bridges between two distinct clusters.

As a simple first step toward integrating these two important views of the above collaboration network, I created this slide show, which morphs back and forth between pure geography and pure network information, showing the interaction of the two along the way (RSS readers must view my actual blog to see this):


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and is copyrighted (c) 2008 by Connective Associates LLC except where otherwise noted.

Read More
Posted in | No comments

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

Working the math in your favor

Posted on 06:16 by Unknown
Last week I was part of a panel discussion about technology and business. Forty or fifty accomplished businesswomen attended--I was the only man in the room. In hindsight, this was a perfect opportunity for me to focus on Bion's three pillars of group behavior (or at least the first of those three pillars, having the mating partner ratio so heavily in my favor); however, I confess I occasionally let my thoughts drift from that #1 priority and instead contemplated the diverse perspectives on technology represented in in the room.

The audience was predominantly business-savvy and ranged from the tech-curious to the tech-confused. It was not the most receptive setting for preaching a Taoist bliss of ignorance, but that's what I pitched, with lines like "the best technology is whatever you're using now"; "reading email when you receive it lowers your IQ more than chronic pot-smoking"; and "technology is implemented to benefit its creators, not its users, so look for technology where the users and the creators are the same."

The room was filled with questions about LinkedIn and Twitter. I realized that LinkedIn has taken hold of a much wider business audience than it had when I last disparaged it on these pages 2-3 years ago. Sensible successful business people speak with complete earnestness about the 500,000 people in their LinkedIn network, and I am speechless.

I have some hope. My LinkedIn network has 2,850,200 people, including 16,927 new connections in just the last 4 days. Before I leverage all of them, however, I sense that LinkedIn is giving me an opportunity to update this old joke:

A museum guide leads a group of tourists through a dinosaur exhibit. Stopping at an impressively scary skeleton baring its fossilized teeth, he says, "This T-Rex is 70 million and 3 years old." One of the tourists responds, "Wow! How do they figure that out so precisely?" The guide responds, "Well, when I started working here, this skeleton was 70 million years old, and that was 3 years ago."

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and is copyrighted (c) 2008 by Connective Associates LLC except where otherwise noted.

Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Even with Web 2.0, we still occasionally need to meet face-to-face
    [In case my irony did not come through in the subject line, let me preface this post with a comment that I am an online community skeptic. H...
  • How to build your network by Brian Uzzi and Shannon Dunlap
    Last week I analyzed the introductions underlying my professional network. Coincidentally, my colleague Steve Frigand sent me a nice foll...
  • Viewing network data in Excel... with banana
    Today I received an invitation from Harvard's Program on Networked Governance to watch Marc Smith demonstrate the powers of . NetMap -...
  • Why math will rock your world (BusinessWeek)
    Click on the image below to read the latest cover story from BusinessWeek : " Why math will rock your world ." When you are ready ...
  • Holiday Special -- The Corrections
    I am just back from Bethlehem, PA, recovering from family time, and settling in for the final countdown to 2005. It's a longish drive fr...
  • Free online network survey utility for Organizational Network Analysis
    Back in December I gave my readers a Christmas present: this free spreadsheet utility for organizational network analysis. Quite a few peop...
  • I hate physicists; Barry Wellman is God
    I attended a talk recently that reminded me of the not-so-hidden rivalry between sociologists and physicists who study networks. Convenientl...
  • Social isolation in America increasing dramatically
    The front page of today's Boston Globe announces " It's lonely out there. " For substantially more detail on this sobering...
  • Qualitative Data, Quantitative Analysis
    Pacey Foster (soon to be professor in the School of Management at UMASS Boston) points me to this essay by H Russell Bernard , "Qualit...
  • Web science, Webwhompers
    I have just unveiled Webwhompers , which bears the fruit of four years of my teaching Web science at Boston University. The site features a ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ▼  November (2)
      • Geographic networks
      • Working the math in your favor
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile