Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 12 July 2006

Are you networked for successful innovation?

Posted on 11:09 by Unknown
MIT Sloan Management Review recently published "Are you networked for successful innovation?" by Professor Polly Rizova of Boston University.

Based on in-depth study of six projects in the R&D lab of a Fortune 500 corporation, Rizova summarizes four key factors behind successful innovation:
  1. Strong corporate support
  2. Open communication without formal reporting
  3. A "technical star" who is central in the technical-advice network
  4. A “managerial star” who is central in the organizational-advice network
Interestingly, Rizova also looked at information-sharing networks and friendship networks, and found these much less relevant than the factors listed above.

Rizova acknowledges that these four factors alone are not enough--they must reinforce each other in order to work. She goes on to discuss the complementary values of the technical-advice and organizational-advice networks, and how people's actual roles in these networks can help inform their explictly prescribed roles in the organization.

This article is a must-read for leaders of R&D units.

It's also a great SNA case study for those wondering exactly which social networks are relevant to their organizational goals. This is one of the hottest questions going in the ONA community of practice (which spawned from the SNA Jump Start conference). For a good follow-up case study, see also David Krackhardt's HBR classic about technical-advice and trust networks.

Thanks to Francesca Grippa for alerting me to this article.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License and is copyrighted (c) 2006 by Connective Associates except where otherwise noted.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Even with Web 2.0, we still occasionally need to meet face-to-face
    [In case my irony did not come through in the subject line, let me preface this post with a comment that I am an online community skeptic. H...
  • How to build your network by Brian Uzzi and Shannon Dunlap
    Last week I analyzed the introductions underlying my professional network. Coincidentally, my colleague Steve Frigand sent me a nice foll...
  • Viewing network data in Excel... with banana
    Today I received an invitation from Harvard's Program on Networked Governance to watch Marc Smith demonstrate the powers of . NetMap -...
  • Why math will rock your world (BusinessWeek)
    Click on the image below to read the latest cover story from BusinessWeek : " Why math will rock your world ." When you are ready ...
  • Holiday Special -- The Corrections
    I am just back from Bethlehem, PA, recovering from family time, and settling in for the final countdown to 2005. It's a longish drive fr...
  • Free online network survey utility for Organizational Network Analysis
    Back in December I gave my readers a Christmas present: this free spreadsheet utility for organizational network analysis. Quite a few peop...
  • I hate physicists; Barry Wellman is God
    I attended a talk recently that reminded me of the not-so-hidden rivalry between sociologists and physicists who study networks. Convenientl...
  • Social isolation in America increasing dramatically
    The front page of today's Boston Globe announces " It's lonely out there. " For substantially more detail on this sobering...
  • Qualitative Data, Quantitative Analysis
    Pacey Foster (soon to be professor in the School of Management at UMASS Boston) points me to this essay by H Russell Bernard , "Qualit...
  • Web science, Webwhompers
    I have just unveiled Webwhompers , which bears the fruit of four years of my teaching Web science at Boston University. The site features a ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ▼  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ▼  July (7)
      • Networks of negative relationships
      • Floyd Landis is God
      • Are you networked for successful innovation?
      • Network healing and adaptability
      • User driven innovation and Karim Lakhani
      • Jeffersonian democracy and net neutrality
      • Independence Day
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile