Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 11 September 2008

Network Clustering: Guide to Stereotyping Rob Cross and Kathleen Carley

Posted on 07:23 by Unknown
Recently I mentioned how network clustering on the WWW indicates that Rob Cross and Kathleen Carley each have their own close-knit camps that co-dominate the world of "organizational network analysis." Before that, I shared Ron Burt's point that such close-knit camps are known not only for amazing productivity but also for stereotyping outsiders.

I am outside both the Cross and Carley camps, but I enjoy stereotyping as much as anyone, so today I provide convenient superficial labels with which my readers can simplify the contributions of these two notable network leaders.

Guide to stereotyping Rob Cross and Kathleen Carley:
  1. Rob Cross provides stories for business
  2. Kathleen Carley provides computer models for the military
Wasn't that easy? Now let's look at one example of each stereotype.

(1) The recent research of the Network Roundtable features Cross's "Braintrust Keynote Presentation." Here is his third slide:
Note the simple and compelling story in the top row of the table: Network density within and across departments of less than 20% indicates little collaboration. If you read the actual presentation, you'll see that the "target density" is only 9.4% because the current density is less than half that, so the target is a healthy step up towards 20%. I will skip the other rows of the table for now.

(2) Kathleen Carley's camp responds to the above story with the following article:
As far as stories go, this article sucks. But look, it is classified under "statistical simulation," because the researchers use computer programs not only to analyze networks, but also to create the very networks that they study (no pesky data collection necessary).

For those whose eyes are glazing over, let me summarize the computer model punchline with a picture. The following three networks all have exactly the same density, 20%; and so according to Cross each of the three networks below has exactly the minimum recommended allowance of connectivity to indicate collaboration:
As you can see, density of 20% means different things depending on how many nodes are in the network.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and is copyrighted (c) 2008 by Connective Associates LLC except where otherwise noted.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Happy, or at least healthy endings
    Yesterday was the 8th anniversary of my first Connectedness post , but it's been 3 years since I was even semi-active in this space. One...
  • How to build your network by Brian Uzzi and Shannon Dunlap
    Last week I analyzed the introductions underlying my professional network. Coincidentally, my colleague Steve Frigand sent me a nice foll...
  • Social capital in one easy lesson
    The power of social network analysis for business is getting a lot of press these days (like this big BusinessWeek article ). Without taking...
  • Viewing network data in Excel... with banana
    Today I received an invitation from Harvard's Program on Networked Governance to watch Marc Smith demonstrate the powers of . NetMap -...
  • Web science, Webwhompers
    I have just unveiled Webwhompers , which bears the fruit of four years of my teaching Web science at Boston University. The site features a ...
  • Why math will rock your world (BusinessWeek)
    Click on the image below to read the latest cover story from BusinessWeek : " Why math will rock your world ." When you are ready ...
  • Evil-Doers at Sunbelt in San Diego
    Tomorrow I fly to San Diego to attend Sunbelt , the annual SNA extravaganza. The keynote address, by Phillip Bonacich , is "Using Socia...
  • Holiday Special -- The Corrections
    I am just back from Bethlehem, PA, recovering from family time, and settling in for the final countdown to 2005. It's a longish drive fr...
  • Free online network survey utility for Organizational Network Analysis
    Back in December I gave my readers a Christmas present: this free spreadsheet utility for organizational network analysis. Quite a few peop...
  • Weekend Edition: More Sex is Safer Sex
    Thanks to my friend Neal Young ( professor of computer science at UC Riverside ) for pointing me to the writings of Steven Landsburg , pro...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ▼  September (6)
      • Structural equivalence: related tags in social boo...
      • Structural equivalence: social bookmarking on a co...
      • Network Centrality: Rob Cross Braintrust Keynote a...
      • Network Clustering: Guide to Stereotyping Rob Cros...
      • Read email or smoke pot---The choice is yours
      • Network Clustering: Rob Cross and Kathleen Carley
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile