Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

Please share with me so that I can beat you

Posted on 05:45 by Unknown
[Ed note: The Connectedness staff is behind in blogging, due to an overload of Web Science synthesis. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.]

Martin Nowak is one of the world's pre-eminent gurus of evolutionary dynamics (which I called "die and adapt" a few months ago). Yesterday at the Harvard Kennedy School Complexity Series, Nowak brilliantly outlined five reasons why I might willingly die so that you can live, and and what adaptations occur in our population as a result:
  1. Kin selection: you are genetically similar enough to me (e.g., child, sibling) that I could rationally decide to sacrifice my own body for the sake of helping your/my DNA
  2. Direct reciprocity: you and I interact repeatedly, and I expect that over time you will repay the favors I give you now
  3. Indirect reciprocity: I may never see you again, but I care about my reputation (and know about yours), and I gain enough in reputation to make it worth doing you a favor.
The above three mechanisms of cooperations were rounded out by two more: graph selection and group selection, which allow one to model (1) a world where people don't randomly mix with the entire world but instead have specific neighborhoods of interaction, and (2) a world where tribes develop collective strategies. This last one (group selection) is still somewhat controversial, and Nowak himself has flip-flopped over the course of his career with respect to it. Currently he believes it is an important dimension of a complete model of the evolution of cooperation.

The talk and audience were theoretical-minded, but the person sitting on my right shared a very pragmatic reason for attending:
"The successful push-pull of collaboration and competition ... [in] both open source programming and wikis and is certain to find its way into many enterprises as collaborative design becomes commonplace."
More about that in his paper, "In Praise of Tweaking," where he makes clear one specific enterprise that is deliberately investing in theoretical evolutionary dynamics in order to redesign its own process of production. Thank you, Ned Gulley.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and is copyrighted (c) 2007 by Connective Associates LLC except where otherwise noted.

Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Happy, or at least healthy endings
    Yesterday was the 8th anniversary of my first Connectedness post , but it's been 3 years since I was even semi-active in this space. One...
  • Discussion with Valdis Krebs: What is a "social" network?
    Congratulations to Valdis Krebs for correctly identifying three out of four of my " mystery quotes " from last week. For those of...
  • Social capital in one easy lesson
    The power of social network analysis for business is getting a lot of press these days (like this big BusinessWeek article ). Without taking...
  • Evil-Doers at Sunbelt in San Diego
    Tomorrow I fly to San Diego to attend Sunbelt , the annual SNA extravaganza. The keynote address, by Phillip Bonacich , is "Using Socia...
  • Searchable leadership networks bibliography
    Our new Link-to-Results site features a categorized searchable bibliography . Of all the pages on the site, this one has generated by far ...
  • Weekend edition: SWMSNA seeks SWF
    It is the great tradition of science that our biggest discoveries often emerge from the smoldering ashes of our most disappointing failures....
  • The Economy of Prestige
    Is it art? Or is it just plain old crap ? Take a look at the preceding website and you will appreciate how difficult it can be to tell the d...
  • Stanley Wasserman and Visible Path
    Stanley Wasserman , renowned statistician and co-author of the essential textbook Social Network Analysis , gave a fun talk to end the curre...
  • What is My Network Value Worth?
    Pedro Domingos and Matt Richardson analyze the power of viral marketing in their paper, " Mining the Network Value of Customers ....
  • Structural equivalence: related tags in social bookmarking
    In my " Holy Trinity of Network Power ," structural equivalence is conceptually the most obscure. But practically speaking, it is ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ▼  February (1)
      • Please share with me so that I can beat you
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile