Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 12 July 2006

Are you networked for successful innovation?

Posted on 11:09 by Unknown
MIT Sloan Management Review recently published "Are you networked for successful innovation?" by Professor Polly Rizova of Boston University.

Based on in-depth study of six projects in the R&D lab of a Fortune 500 corporation, Rizova summarizes four key factors behind successful innovation:
  1. Strong corporate support
  2. Open communication without formal reporting
  3. A "technical star" who is central in the technical-advice network
  4. A “managerial star” who is central in the organizational-advice network
Interestingly, Rizova also looked at information-sharing networks and friendship networks, and found these much less relevant than the factors listed above.

Rizova acknowledges that these four factors alone are not enough--they must reinforce each other in order to work. She goes on to discuss the complementary values of the technical-advice and organizational-advice networks, and how people's actual roles in these networks can help inform their explictly prescribed roles in the organization.

This article is a must-read for leaders of R&D units.

It's also a great SNA case study for those wondering exactly which social networks are relevant to their organizational goals. This is one of the hottest questions going in the ONA community of practice (which spawned from the SNA Jump Start conference). For a good follow-up case study, see also David Krackhardt's HBR classic about technical-advice and trust networks.

Thanks to Francesca Grippa for alerting me to this article.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License and is copyrighted (c) 2006 by Connective Associates except where otherwise noted.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Happy, or at least healthy endings
    Yesterday was the 8th anniversary of my first Connectedness post , but it's been 3 years since I was even semi-active in this space. One...
  • Technology, sociology, and networks
    Behind the scenes at Connectedness , I have been talking to more computer scientists and fewer sociologists, relative to previous months. I ...
  • Social capital of twenty-first-century leaders, by Daniel Brass and David Krackhardt
    How do effective leaders manage relationships with their team members? Dan Brass and David Krackhardt put this question in context: "...
  • Weekend edition: SWMSNA seeks SWF
    It is the great tradition of science that our biggest discoveries often emerge from the smoldering ashes of our most disappointing failures....
  • Structural equivalence: related tags in social bookmarking
    In my " Holy Trinity of Network Power ," structural equivalence is conceptually the most obscure. But practically speaking, it is ...
  • Weekend Edition: Flesh-Eating Zombies
    As part of my final preparations for Sunbelt XXV , I watched a dramatic treatment of infection networks. 28 Days Later is the modern-day st...
  • What is My Network Value Worth?
    Pedro Domingos and Matt Richardson analyze the power of viral marketing in their paper, " Mining the Network Value of Customers ....
  • Sunbelt Goes to the Oscars
    I am dried off from the record-setting rains of Sunbelt XXV and ready to start reflecting... about this weekend's big Oscar hoo-ha (sor...
  • Searchable leadership networks bibliography
    Our new Link-to-Results site features a categorized searchable bibliography . Of all the pages on the site, this one has generated by far ...
  • Process networks in medical research
    I tripped over this interesting post by John Hagel : " Process networks in medical research ," in which he describes the Myelin Re...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ▼  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ▼  July (7)
      • Networks of negative relationships
      • Floyd Landis is God
      • Are you networked for successful innovation?
      • Network healing and adaptability
      • User driven innovation and Karim Lakhani
      • Jeffersonian democracy and net neutrality
      • Independence Day
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile