Connecte Dness

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Six ways to make Web 2.0 work: Hoppe vs McKinsey

Posted on 08:39 by Unknown
Nat Welch brought to my attention "Six ways to make Web 2.0 work" in the McKinsey Quarterly of Feb 2009.

Here are the six ways (quoted verbatim):
  1. The transformation to a bottom-up culture needs help from the top
  2. The best uses come from users -- but they need help to scale
  3. What's in the workflow is what gets used
  4. Appeal to the particpants' egos and needs -- not just their wallets
  5. The right solution comes from the right participants
  6. Balance the top-down and self-management of risk
Maybe it's because I am jealous of the clout wielded by McKinsey, but I do find the above list awfully repetitive. Someone please help me understand the important distinctions between numbers 1, 2, 5, and 6. I'll give the benefit of the doubt to 3 & 4 for being not repeats of 1, 2, 5, 6.

In preparation for an upcoming Web 2.0 panel discussion hosted by the Boston Club, I made my own list--with inspiration & edits from Nat W.

Bruce's Technology Tips

Focus on your business goals and let those drive your technology strategy. For example, consider the following goals:
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Recruiting
  • Talent management
  • Business development
  • Innovation of core products & services
Each one of those goals implies a different technology strategy, so it's important to know which goals matter as a basis for evaluating which technologies are helpful.

Web 2.0 Strategy Map

Technology for business is largely about storing, finding, synthesizing, and communicating information. Think about how these different tasks relate to your specific business goals. The table below summarizes how some Web 2.0 technologies relate to finding and synthesizing information:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Connective Associates LLC except where otherwise noted.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Happy, or at least healthy endings
    Yesterday was the 8th anniversary of my first Connectedness post , but it's been 3 years since I was even semi-active in this space. One...
  • Social capital of twenty-first-century leaders, by Daniel Brass and David Krackhardt
    How do effective leaders manage relationships with their team members? Dan Brass and David Krackhardt put this question in context: "...
  • Technology, sociology, and networks
    Behind the scenes at Connectedness , I have been talking to more computer scientists and fewer sociologists, relative to previous months. I ...
  • Structural equivalence: related tags in social bookmarking
    In my " Holy Trinity of Network Power ," structural equivalence is conceptually the most obscure. But practically speaking, it is ...
  • Weekend edition: SWMSNA seeks SWF
    It is the great tradition of science that our biggest discoveries often emerge from the smoldering ashes of our most disappointing failures....
  • Weekend Edition: Flesh-Eating Zombies
    As part of my final preparations for Sunbelt XXV , I watched a dramatic treatment of infection networks. 28 Days Later is the modern-day st...
  • What is My Network Value Worth?
    Pedro Domingos and Matt Richardson analyze the power of viral marketing in their paper, " Mining the Network Value of Customers ....
  • Sunbelt Goes to the Oscars
    I am dried off from the record-setting rains of Sunbelt XXV and ready to start reflecting... about this weekend's big Oscar hoo-ha (sor...
  • Searchable leadership networks bibliography
    Our new Link-to-Results site features a categorized searchable bibliography . Of all the pages on the site, this one has generated by far ...
  • Process networks in medical research
    I tripped over this interesting post by John Hagel : " Process networks in medical research ," in which he describes the Myelin Re...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ▼  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ▼  February (4)
      • Role ecologies in online networks: Gleave, Welser,...
      • Six ways to make Web 2.0 work: Hoppe vs McKinsey
      • Ethics, Social Networks, and Web 2.0
      • Lincoln and Darwin on Networks and Web 2.0
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (36)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (42)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2006 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2005 (136)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2004 (99)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile